Like clockwork, Tesla reported Autopilot safety statistics, once every quarter, starting in 2018. Last year, those reports ceased.
Around the same time, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the nation鈥檚 top auto safety regulator, began demanding crash reports from automakers that sell so-called advanced driver assistance systems such as Autopilot. It began releasing those numbers in June. And those numbers don鈥檛 look good for Autopilot.
Tesla won鈥檛 say why it stopped reporting its safety statistics, which measure crash rates per miles driven. The company employs no media relations department. A tweet sent to Tesla Chief Executive Elon Musk inviting his comments went unanswered.

A Tesla crashed into a police vehicle, which slammed into an ambulance in July 2020 in Cochise County, Ariz. It鈥檚 one of many Autopilot-related crashes still being investigated by federal safety regulators.
Tesla critics are happy to speak up about the situation, however. Taylor Ogan, chief executive at fund management firm Snow Bull Capital, held a Twitter Spaces event last Thursday to run through his own interpretation of Tesla safety numbers. He thinks he knows why the company ceased reporting its safety record: 鈥淏ecause it鈥檚 gotten a lot worse.鈥
People are also reading…
Also last week, NHTSA announced it had added two more crashes to the dozens of automated-driving Tesla incidents that it鈥檚 already investigating. One involved eight vehicles, including a Tesla Model S, on the San Francisco Bay Bridge on Thanksgiving Day. Through Friday鈥檚 close, Tesla stock has lost 65% of its value this year.
Ogan, using NHTSA crash numbers, Tesla鈥檚 previous reports, sales numbers and other records, concluded that the number of reported Tesla crashes on U.S. roads has grown far faster than Tesla鈥檚 sales growth. The average monthly growth in new Teslas since NHTSA issued its standing order was 6%, he figures, while comparable crash stats rose 21%.
The Tesla Autopilot crash numbers are far higher than those of similar driver-assistance systems from General Motors and Ford. Tesla has reported 516 crashes from July 2021 through November 2022, while Ford reported seven and GM two.
To be sure, Tesla has far more vehicles equipped with driver-assist systems than the competition 鈥 an estimated 1 million, Ogan said, about 10 times as many as Ford. All else equal, that would imply Tesla ought to have a NHTSA-reported crash total of 70 since last summer to be comparable with Ford鈥檚 rate. Instead, Tesla reported 516 crashes.
Tesla鈥檚 quarterly safety reports were always controversial. They did put Tesla Autopilot in a good light: For the fourth quarter of 2021, Tesla reported one crash per 4.31 million miles driven in cars equipped with Autopilot. The company compared that with government statistics that show one crash per 484,000 miles driven on the nation鈥檚 roadways, for all vehicles and all drivers.
But statisticians have pointed out serious analytical flaws, including the fact that the Tesla stats involve newer cars being driven on highways. The government鈥檚 general statistics include cars of all ages on highways, rural roads and neighborhood streets. In other words, the comparison is apples and oranges.
None of the statistics, Tesla鈥檚 or the government鈥檚, separate out Autopilot from the company鈥檚 controversial Full Self-Driving feature. FSD is a $15,000 option that鈥檚 more aspirational than its name implies: No car being sold today is fully autonomous, including those with FSD.
Autopilot combines adaptive cruise control with lane-keeping and lane-switching systems on highways. FSD is marketed as advanced artificial intelligence technology that can cruise neighborhood streets, stop and go at traffic lights, make turns onto busy streets and generally behave as if the car drives itself. The fine print, however, makes clear the human driver must be in full control and is legally liable for crashes 鈥 including those involving injuries and deaths.
The internet is filled with videos of FSD behaving badly 鈥 turning into oncoming traffic, confusing railroad tracks for roadways, running red lights and more.
The number of injuries and deaths involving Autopilot and FSD is unknown 鈥 except, perhaps, to Tesla. Publicly available safety statistics about autonomous and semiautonomous vehicles are scarce. Meanwhile, the crash reporting system in the U.S. is rooted in 1960s methodology, and no serious attempt to update it for the digital world appears to be in the works, at NHTSA or elsewhere.
NHTSA鈥檚 driver-assist crash statistic collection order, issued in 2021, depends on the car companies for accurate and complete reporting. (Musk has misstated FSD鈥檚 safety record in the past, including a claim that the technology had been involved in no crashes, when the public record made clear it had.)
Not all the information sent to NHTSA is available for public scrutiny.
Ogan, who drives an FSD-equipped Tesla, said more public information would allow a lot more transparency into robot car safety, at Tesla and other automakers. Tesla once reported its Autopilot utilization rate but no longer does so. 鈥淚鈥檓 looking at the only data available,鈥 he said.
The California Department of Motor Vehicles has been investigating whether Tesla is violating its rule against marketing vehicles as fully autonomous when they鈥檙e not. Musk has stated clearly that the company plans to develop FSD to create a fully autonomous robotaxi that Tesla owners could rent out for extra cash. He had promised 1 million of them on the road by 2020, but that date came and went and no fully autonomous Tesla exists. The DMV declined to comment.
FSD鈥檚 safety and capabilities are, by Musk鈥檚 own admission, existential concerns 鈥 especially as Tesla stock continues to dive-bomb. In a June interview with Axios, he said that 鈥渟olving鈥 FSD is 鈥渞eally the difference between Tesla being worth a lot of money and being worth basically zero.鈥
Elon Musk and Twitter: A timeline
January 31: Musk begins building up his Twitter stake

Musk starts quietly buying up Twitter shares, building his stake in the company. But it would be months before he disclosed this fact to the public.
March 14: Musk's Twitter stake tops 5%

Musk's stake in Twitter tops 5%, but that fact is not disclosed until the following month. Musk was obligated to disclose his stake within 10 days of crossing the 5% threshold, but waited 21 days to do so. During that time, he continued building up his stake.
March 24: Asking whether Twitter should change

The billionaire begins to make pointed statements about the platform from his account. "Twitter algorithm should be open source," he wrote, with a poll for users to vote "yes" or "no."
The following day, Musk tweets out another poll to his followers: "Free speech is essential to a functioning democracy. Do you believe Twitter rigorously adheres to this principle?"
April 29: Musk cashes out billions in Tesla stock

Filings reveal Musk sold $8.5 billion of his Tesla stock in the three days after Twitter board agreed to the sale for an average of $883.09 per share. The filings did not disclose the reason for the sale, but Musk appeared to be raising funds to buy Twitter.